These blocks are environment friendly as the waste like fly ash or bottom ash is used as raw material. These hollow concrete blocks can be used in the construction of load-bearing structure up to 6 stories high with steel. The special hollow concrete blocks can be used as horizontal reinforcements like lintels and horizontal reinforced concrete can build with blocks. These bricks are made using the waste from fly ash which is the waste from a thermal power plants and it is hard to dispose of.
The price of the blocks is high compared to fly ash bricks for construction. The price is depending on the availability in the market. The mechanical strength of fly ash brick is less but it can improve by adding marble waste of mortar. These bricks can manufacture in limited size and modular size is produced only. The large size of brick has higher chances of breakages.
The bricks have a low heat-absorbing capacity. This is can be used in a subtropical region or where the climate is warm. This variation is depending on the grade of concrete and the extent of the cavity. The hollow concrete block has a compressive strength of hollow concrete block ranges from 3.
Fly Ash Bricks has compressive strength from 3. The hollow concrete blocks are costlier than fly ash bricks but the overall masonry cost is low. As it consumes less mortar. The fly ash bricks are cheap but the overall cost is high as it requires more mortar than hollow concrete blocks. The hollow concrete blocks are environment-friendly building material and also energy-efficient as they have proper insulating properties.
The fly ash brick is also environmentally friendly. It is the waste of thermal power plant and not easy to dispose. Both products are environmentally friendly and the raw material used is industrial waste. This comparison will help you to choose according to your application.
Which is better for masonry? Which is cheaper in constructing house a red brick or hollow brick? Why many people chose red brick instead of hollow brick. Which will stay longer run and if we want demolish which will be easier? Therefore using hollow bricks for constructing partition walls doesn't make much difference load wise. However solid bricks have many advantages like better thermal and acoustics properties.
I think it will easier to demolish the hollow bricks wall. Many people raise doubt about possibility of putting nails on the walls for hanging calendars, clocks and such other things. One possibility is to have outer walls made of solid bricks and the inner partition walls made of hollow bricks. Let us encourage each other in sharing knowledge. The methods and technologies are changing building construction also. We have moved from mud walls to solid rock buildings to soft red raw cut stones to burnt bricks and cement blocks and hollow blocks.
There can be more variations also depending on geography and needs. Multi-storeyed buildings are mostly built by the reinforced column and beam method. Here there is a necessity to bring down the load without reducing strength. The load is optimally spread across beams and pillars or columns. Thus the load is not resting on the walls.
So walls need not be made with aim of taking the load. They serve only the need of enclosure and partition. Hollow bricks serve this best. There are laid out standards for the quality of hollow bricks also. Hollow bricks also help in easy drilling for fixtures etc. In case of removl also I is relatively easy o remove even a small portion for repair or for other purposes.
However one should bear in mind two things before choosing burnt bricks or hollow bricks. Easy availability in the locality 2. Quality If the place is near rivers and fields with clay soil, then that area will be having more brick kilns, and that will make red bricks cheaper and easily available in that area. Their efficient acoustic insulation is a big help if your home is constantly surrounded by noise that could keep you from getting a sound sleep.
You can think of the advantage of soundproofing if you ever resided close to railways or airports. Space saving: Builders and contractors are mostly recommending concrete blocks because they save quite some space at large.
The usual 9 inch walls of the traditional bricks are getting replaced for good, especially since there is a lot of fight for space in big cities. However, a lot depends on place, budget and situation of the builder. For some, brick masonry constructions are necessary because they ultimately want lesser maintenance even when the cost of building is higher.
Some people, on the other side would prefer less cost of construction and regular renovations to keep the blocks well maintained.
Making of red bricks is not so eco-friendly it seems but the same can be said about the blocks not being up for the purpose of recycle. Red brick-kilns remain under the scrutiny of government and NGT while concrete block industry are on the rise at many places. Discussion RE: Bricks or blocks - which are better for construction? Bricks keep home cooler in high temperature and vice-versa. Bricks are environment friendly as they are prepared by using top soil, which is safe for environment.
A building raised using bricks hardly needs any maintenance later. On the other hand, these days cement blocks are mostly laid for new houses which are comparatively, stronger and prevent natural disasters, like, hurricanes, earthquake, etc.
In fact, they are light weighted, cheaper in cost and save space while building a room. Blocks are flexible and more durable along with sound proof feature. Choosing bricks or blocks depends on the circumstances of a builder. Some prefers, bricks and some blocks according to the advantages or drawbacks of material. Should autistic children be sent to normal schools or specia Are mobile towers in residential areas harmful? Gold monetization scheme - pros and cons Boarding school vs Day school - Which is better?
Physical Education should not be mandatory in schools!
0コメント